A roundup of some of the most common but entirely untrue tales and visuals of the week. None of these are legit, even however they ended up shared commonly on social media. The Connected Push checked them out. Right here are the specifics:
— — —
Posts misrepresent 2019 ‘satirical’ amendment to Kentucky abortion regulation
Claim: Kentucky is thinking of legislation that would need ladies to post to the point out each individual month a statement from a medical professional indicating if they are expecting — or else deal with penalties.
The points: The legislation was an amendment proposed in jest by a Democratic lawmaker in 2019 to express her opposition to a bill banning abortions, and was not seriously regarded.
The only two abortion clinics in Kentucky halted the process on June 24 following the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. Kentucky in 2019 handed a regulation declaring that abortion would turn out to be illegal “effective immediately” if Roe v. Wade is overturned. The evaluate consists of a slim exception allowing for a medical doctor to execute a procedure needed to stop the death or long term injuries of a expecting female.
But on the internet, some are sharing screenshots of a proposed amendment to that 2019 bill that was introduced by Democratic condition Rep. Mary Lou Marzian as satire — and under no circumstances seriously pursued.
The amendment known as for requiring girls who dwell in Kentucky to obtain month-to-month statements from medical practitioners stating whether they are expecting. It also demanded that people records be submitted to the condition, or women would confront arrest and fines, and went so far as to propose ankle displays for expecting ladies who didn’t comply.
Posts circulating on Fb, Twitter and TikTok in recent days misrepresented the modification as an energetic and major proposal. “They are making an attempt to have to have ALL ladies /women of all ages to get monthly physicals to demonstrate you aren’t pregnant. This is the most insane detail I have at any time witnessed,” reads just one Facebook put up.
But Marzian reiterated this week that the evaluate was from 2019 and intended to serve as commentary on the bill banning abortions.
“Totally satire,” Marzian told The Connected Press by cellular phone. “It was an modification, it was under no circumstances read in committee, I experienced no intention of ever relocating it.” Marzian, who supports abortion legal rights, claimed she has filed numerous steps more than the several years that ended up satirical in character and developed to make her political opponents glance like “morons.”
A fixture in the Kentucky Dwelling for practically 30 several years, Marzian withdrew from her reelection marketing campaign previously this year.
— Related Press writer Angelo Fichera in Philadelphia contributed this report.
— — —
Pentagon assertion on SCOTUS abortion ruling mischaracterized
Assert: The Pentagon mentioned that any abortion rules enacted as a outcome of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade will not be identified.
The specifics: This mischaracterizes a June 24 assertion on the ruling from Secretary of Protection Lloyd J. Austin III, which did not say the Pentagon would defy the courtroom, nor did it say it would violate any state laws that may perhaps be enacted. Deceptive posts about the Pentagon’s response distribute greatly on the web soon right after the Supreme Courtroom handed down its choice on abortion.
Whilst quite a few well known posts did not share a resource for the info, some vaguely cited news content describing Austin’s statement.
“Nothing is more critical to me or to this Office than the health and effectively-remaining of our Support members, the civilian workforce and DOD people,” read the assertion, which as of this week was the only formal interaction from the Pentagon on the make any difference. “I am committed to taking treatment of our people and making certain the readiness and resilience of our Pressure. The Section is examining this decision intently and evaluating our procedures to make certain we go on to provide seamless access to reproductive wellness treatment as permitted by federal regulation.”
The Twitter account BNN Newsroom on June 25 wrote in a given that-deleted write-up that, “The Pentagon has said that any abortion legislation enacted as a outcome of the U.S. Supreme Court’s final decision will not be identified.” BNN did not respond to a request for comment.
Later that day, the Twitter account Occupy Democrats also misinterpreted the written content of the Pentagon release, tweeting, “President Biden’s Pentagon defies the extremist Supreme Court, announces that it will not figure out any anti-abortion rules enacted by states as a consequence of the Supreme Court’s determination.”
Occupy Democrats adopted up with a tweet on June 26 linking to an article about Austin’s assertion with the caption “source.” Having said that, the quick write-up also did not recommend the statement intended the Pentagon was defying the courtroom. Occupy Democrats did not return requests for remark. Pentagon spokesperson Maj. Charlie Dietz told the AP that claims the Pentagon is “ignoring the legislation are absolutely wrong.”
He pointed to Austin’s statement, which he claimed was “the only assertion built regarding the courtroom instances,” but declined to remark further more. The court’s overturning of the landmark Roe v. Wade ruling is probable to guide to abortion bans in approximately fifty percent the states.
Kyndra K. Rotunda, a Chapman University professor who runs the school’s Navy and Veterans Regulation Institute, claimed the statements circulating on-line did not surface to be correct, incorporating that she saw no evidence in the assertion, or in any other case, that the military services would “refuse to comply with state regulation.”
“I examine Secretary Lloyd’s assertion to signify no far more than what he claims: they’re likely to explore it more,” Rotunda wrote in an email to the AP. TRICARE, the health and fitness treatment plan for assistance associates, retirees and their family members, handles abortions in situations of rape, incest or if a woman’s everyday living is in risk. The U.S. Department of Veteran’s Affairs site states that “Under present regulation, VA does not present abortion or abortion counseling.”
Under present federal legislation, a armed service member can seek an abortion outdoors of a armed forces facility, in accordance with state law exactly where they are found, but the Pentagon will not fund or conduct the treatment except in circumstances of rape, incest or if a woman’s everyday living is in danger, Rotunda discussed.
— Connected Press writers Sophia Tulp in New York and Josh Kelety in Phoenix contributed this report.
— — —
Bricks were saved on DC street for pre-scheduled construction
Claim: A photograph demonstrates pallets of bricks alongside a Washington, D.C., road that had been intentionally positioned in the space to really encourage violent protesting following the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.
The info: The bricks were saved alongside the highway for operate on an unrelated building undertaking that had been planned months in advance. Residents had been notified of the challenge about 10 days prior to June 24, the working day the court produced its choice.
Hrs following the Supreme Court taken out constitutional protections for abortion, fake promises distribute online resurfacing an previous, deceptive narrative that pallets of bricks had been being deliberately placed in U.S. streets, with the recommendation that they have been planted to incite violence during expected protests. The notion earlier circulated extensively on the net during protests versus racial injustice all over the summer time of 2020, and all over again in 2021 linked to protests in Kenosha, Wisconsin.
On June 24, U.S. Rep. Lauren Boebert, a Republican Congresswoman from Colorado, tweeted a image of the bricks and named the Capitol Law enforcement, asking them “why are there 20 pallets of bricks one block from the House Place of work Buildings?” While Boebert didn’t ascribe a motive to the bricks’ placement, a lot of commenting and sharing her concept did.
“Meanwhile, another person paid out to haul pallets of bricks in and deposited them just 2 blocks from the Capitol workplaces?” wrote one person. “It’s as if they want violence and riot,” commented an additional.
But the statements are wrong. The bricks ended up saved together the 400 block of Very first Avenue by an alley paving contractor below a allow issued by the District Division of Transportation for an ongoing building project. While the commencing of the project coincided with the day the Supreme Courtroom introduced the choice on abortion, the operate experienced been scheduled very well in progress, in accordance to a spokesperson for DDOT and official notices sent by the company and reviewed by The Connected Press.
Geolocation information accessed via Google Maps confirms the image being shared on-line was taken alongside the 400 block of To start with Avenue, and a map of ongoing street assignments printed by DDOT also lists the very same stretch as an alley at the moment below design.
A letter despatched to residents and organizations along the design route dated June 16 explained that DDOT was starting an alley improvement job “on or about Thursday, June 23, 2022.” The discover specified that the job would “include concrete/brick get the job done.”
Arrived at on the cell phone Monday, the proprietor of a business situated along the building web-site, who did not want to be named, verified they acquired the see, and claimed ongoing do the job was staying carried out on the road. Even so, it was not recognised accurately when, or if, the Supreme Court would provide a conclusion on the abortion situation. The court docket on June 22 additional June 24 as an additional choice day.
Mariam Nabizad, a public affairs professional for DDOT, told the AP that stacks of bricks had been put along the block the morning of June 24 “for scheduled and ongoing alley restoration work” by its contractors. “Our groups wrapped the stacks in plastic at the close of that perform day, and also eliminated them from the place Saturday evening,” Nabizad wrote in an e-mail. She extra that the job operate was determined on Sept. 7, 2021, and incorporated in the city’s PaveDC Strategy that was dispersed in Oct 2021.
— Sophia Tulp
— — —
Tennessee lab isn’t trying to open a portal to a parallel universe
Assert: Researchers at a laboratory in Tennessee are making an attempt to figure out no matter whether parallel universes exist by making an attempt to open a portal into a different dimension.
The details: Experts at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in jap Tennessee carried out an experiment in 2019 to study a kind of “exotic” neutron behavior, which some news shops and social media posts inaccurately referred to as browsing for “portals” to “parallel” realities.
One this kind of commonly-shared publish claimed the researchers ended up conducting an experiment straight out of a science fiction film.
“Scientists in Tennessee functioning at the Oak Ridge Countrywide Laboratory in japanese Tennessee, have announced that they’re making an attempt to determine out regardless of whether or not parallel universes exist,” claimed the Facebook post, which gained additional than 130,000 shares. “They uncovered that they’re hoping to open a portal into a further dimension.”
But the researchers say that declare actually is fiction. “My reaction to looking through a headline like that is to say, ‘well, that sounds actually cool. I question what they are performing due to the fact it truly doesn’t seem like my investigate,’” joked Leah Broussard, the scientist at Oak Ridge Countrywide Laboratory who led the undertaking.
Sara Shoemaker, a spokesperson for the lab, added that, even though an entertaining thought, the research doesn’t have anything at all to do with portals or parallel universes the way they’ve been described online. “A ‘portal’ in this case is a figurative concept utilised in the physics neighborhood,” defined Shoemaker. “The team’s experiments have been not exploring a literal portal to a parallel universe.”
The study essentially involved searching for opportunity interactions in between neutrons and a type of theorized darkish make a difference referred to as “mirror make a difference.” The theorized mirror sector, at times termed a mirror universe, is believed to be “just a different duplicate of the particles and the interactions we have in our universe,” Broussard defined.
She said that it is not the exact factor as a parallel universe because it would exist in the exact same spacetime as, and “very a lot section of,” our universe. She reported her team sought to test a probable hypothesis that neutrons could, in some cases, be transforming into mirror neutrons, the dark-issue twin. Broussard’s staff built an experiment to see if they could “watch neutrons going via a wall” that would typically prevent them, she stated.
The process of the neutrons becoming despatched by the wall has been figuratively explained as relocating through a “portal,” but that does not imply that the neutrons are getting despatched to a mysterious other dimension, independent from our possess, both of those she and Shoemaker said. Shoemaker additional that earlier reporting by information outlets “had pleasurable having liberties with the idea,” comparing the so-known as portal to a doorway accessing alternate realities and other Hollywood tropes. Finally, the crew did not observe any neutrons on the other aspect of the wall, meaning this distinct experiment did not obtain proof of this sort of “mirror neutrons.” These results were being outlined in the peer-reviewed, scientific journal Physical Evaluate Letters in Could.
— Sophia Tulp
— — —
Come across AP Point Checks in this article: https://apnews.com/APFactCheck
Comply with @APFactCheck on Twitter: https://twitter.com/APFactCheck